4 Comments Already

commenter
Oran Said,
September 17th, 2008 @5:00 pm  

WPF was designed with Remote Desktop in mind. If I understand correctly, it is capable of remoting only the visual tree and taking advantage of the client’s CPU/GPU.

I would also note that the only other “real” or “giant” WPF application from Microsoft is Blend, essentially a dev tool.

commenter
Aaron Said,
September 17th, 2008 @8:33 pm  

My understanding is that although WPF was designed with it in mind, very little of what was intended actually shipped. They don’t do the remoting as they had originally intended at all.

Blend is sluggish on my machines — so I hope that doesn’t represent future VS performance.

commenter
jwiese Said,
September 25th, 2008 @11:20 am  

Keep in mind that there will likely be many other things done under the covers. So, perhaps a WPF UI will not be so bad. Yes, just replacing the current UI with a WPF UI would be an issue as there are many performance problems with large solutions. But, if the underlying architecture was changed to optimize performance then a WPF based UI would give you more benefits than drawbacks.

commenter
September 28th, 2008 @10:27 pm  

Aaron,

You are spot on with your doubts about the next version of VS. Blend SUCKS for me on a remote desktop session, even if I select the LAN option (10Mbps). I wonder if VS10 will be any better, we can just hope…

Related Post

Please Leave Your Comments Below

Please Note: All comments are moderated, so it may take some time before your comment appears.