<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why is VMware Workstation 6.5RC1 a 544MB download?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wiredprairie.us/blog/index.php/archives/476/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wiredprairie.us/blog/index.php/archives/476</link>
	<description>A little bit of everything: software, apps, usability, programming, design and whatever else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 03:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toni</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredprairie.us/blog/index.php/archives/476/comment-page-1#comment-968</link>
		<dc:creator>Toni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 03:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredprairie.us/blog/index.php/archives/476#comment-968</guid>
		<description>Well, WS 6.5 for Windows is that big probably because it has both 32 and 64-bit versions in the same executable!

You can see that the Linux versions  are around 380 MB as they have separate versions for 32 and 64-bit systems!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, WS 6.5 for Windows is that big probably because it has both 32 and 64-bit versions in the same executable!</p>
<p>You can see that the Linux versions  are around 380 MB as they have separate versions for 32 and 64-bit systems!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredprairie.us/blog/index.php/archives/476/comment-page-1#comment-656</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredprairie.us/blog/index.php/archives/476#comment-656</guid>
		<description>I suppose I should be thankful that it&#039;s not 2GB! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose I should be thankful that it&#8217;s not 2GB! <img src='http://www.wiredprairie.us/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justme</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredprairie.us/blog/index.php/archives/476/comment-page-1#comment-655</link>
		<dc:creator>Justme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredprairie.us/blog/index.php/archives/476#comment-655</guid>
		<description>Welcome to software bloat....... 

think about it.... if WS5 to WS6 was 6 times the size, so..... that means WS6.5 could have been upto 2GB! to stay inline. :)

As its only a .5 release, lets say 3 times the size, so thats only 1630mb!

But yes a nearly 10 times increase in download size from WS5 to WS6.5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to software bloat&#8230;&#8230;. </p>
<p>think about it&#8230;. if WS5 to WS6 was 6 times the size, so&#8230;.. that means WS6.5 could have been upto 2GB! to stay inline. <img src='http://www.wiredprairie.us/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As its only a .5 release, lets say 3 times the size, so thats only 1630mb!</p>
<p>But yes a nearly 10 times increase in download size from WS5 to WS6.5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

