<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If Microsoft concentrated on ONE thing, what would you pick?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wiredprairie.us/blog/index.php/archives/296/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wiredprairie.us/blog/index.php/archives/296</link>
	<description>A little bit of everything: software, apps, usability, programming, design and whatever else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 03:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Komodo Dragon</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredprairie.us/blog/index.php/archives/296/comment-page-1#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Komodo Dragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 09:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredprairie.us/blog/index.php/archives/296#comment-201</guid>
		<description>I am going to be the odd one, and say Vista. Because Vista needs alot more work still!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to be the odd one, and say Vista. Because Vista needs alot more work still!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredprairie.us/blog/index.php/archives/296/comment-page-1#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 04:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredprairie.us/blog/index.php/archives/296#comment-191</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d definitely agree that MS needs to work on Silverlight to give it a better chance. It&#039;s great that it&#039;s .NET, but it can&#039;t rest on that being the only reason someone would adopt it. It needs to be more competitive with Flex/Flash/AIR than it is today to truly succeed and not just be niche. Thanks for the comment neil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d definitely agree that MS needs to work on Silverlight to give it a better chance. It&#8217;s great that it&#8217;s .NET, but it can&#8217;t rest on that being the only reason someone would adopt it. It needs to be more competitive with Flex/Flash/AIR than it is today to truly succeed and not just be niche. Thanks for the comment neil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilweber</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredprairie.us/blog/index.php/archives/296/comment-page-1#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>neilweber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 16:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredprairie.us/blog/index.php/archives/296#comment-186</guid>
		<description>Definitely Silverlight.  If one were creating a RIA *today*, the most conservative architectural choice is Flex/Flash/AIR.  Microsoft needs to enhance Silverlight to change that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely Silverlight.  If one were creating a RIA *today*, the most conservative architectural choice is Flex/Flash/AIR.  Microsoft needs to enhance Silverlight to change that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

